Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Carmen Denise Heredia, 03-10585 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 03-10585 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 11, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 460 F.3d 1093 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmen Denise HEREDIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-10585. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 11, 2006. Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deconcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Wanda Day, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant. ORDER MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered tha
More

460 F.3d 1093

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carmen Denise HEREDIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-10585.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 11, 2006.

Nathan D. Leonardo, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Evo A. Deconcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wanda Day, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER

MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer